Legal Opinion · Dissent

In re the Estate of Glazer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 30, 1992Published

1Dissent

Callahan, J. P.

(dissenting). I do not concur with the majority’s view because it encourages additional legal maneuvers and delays resolution of this ongoing family feud. These *1068parties have been before this Court on a prior appeal (Matter of Glazer, 168 AD2d 975, mot to dismiss appeal granted 77 NY2d 939). The only issue on that appeal was whether Malcolm Glazer was guilty of civil contempt. We disagreed with the Surrogate and reversed the finding of civil contempt. That was the holding of that case, nothing more.

It is readily apparent from a reading of the decision in this record that the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re GlazerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API