Legal Opinion

Murray v. McDonald

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided October 5, 1998No. 98-7061PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Craig Murray and Charmaine Adams appeal from the judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Vermont (William K. Sessions III, Judge), dismissing their action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, pursuant to the Tax Injunction Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1341.1 Appellants had sought a declaratory judgment from the district court, invalidating a Vermont tax refund statute, Act of June 20, 1994, No. 223, 1994 Vt. Acts & Resolves, reprinted in Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 32, § 8911 (historical notation) (“Act 223”), insofar as that statute authorized the refund of certain taxes paid,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
  2. Alexander v. Town of BartonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1989
  3. Greg R. Barringer Judith M. Barringer v. Michael D. GriffesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
  4. Christensen v. GriffesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1996
  5. Murray v. McDonaldDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 1997

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. MURRAY v. McDONALDCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API