Legal Opinion

Omaha v. Hammond

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 29, 1877PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Nebraska. Th¿ facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Miller

The defendant in error, plaintiff below, sued the city of Omaha on a contract for the construction of two public wells in the streets of that city. The contract was in writing, and by its terms plaintiff was “to sink and construct two wells, . . .. said wells to be circular, twelve feet in diameter, and to be curbed with a brick wall nine inches in thickness, and arched over in a secure and proper manner, the whole to be completed under the supervision and to the satisfaction of the chief engineer of the fire department of said city.”

For this work the' city was to pay plaintiff “one hundred…

2Cited by17 opinions

  1. Fitzgerald v. WalkerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1891
  2. Norcross v. WymanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
  3. City of Gering v. Patricia G. Smith Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Brooke v. Laurens Milling Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1907
  5. Halvorson v. Blue Mountain Prune Growers CooperativeOregon Supreme Court · 1950

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API