Bowman v. City of Southfield
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
377 Mich. 237 (1966)
140 N.W.2d 504
BOWMAN
v.
CITY OF SOUTHFIELD.
Calendar No. 48. Docket No. 50,695.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
Decided March 8, 1966.
Davis, Hayward, Rann & Slavens, for plaintiff.
James M. Ginn, for defendants.
SMITH, J. (for reversal).
Plaintiff sought and obtained judgment against defendant city and its officials declaring a zoning ordinance void and unenforceable, insofar as applied to plaintiff's property. Defendants appeal.
In 1959, the city adopted an ordinance which zoned plaintiff's property residential. Although the property is located in a residential area, plaintiff has used…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Brae Burn, Inc. v. City of Bloomfield HillsMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
- Christine Building Co. v. City of TroyMichigan Supreme Court · 1962
- Austin v. OlderMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
- City of North Muskegon v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.