Legal Opinion

Bowman v. City of Southfield

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 8, 1966No. Calendar 48. Docket 50,695Published

1Opinion of the Court

377 Mich. 237 (1966)

140 N.W.2d 504

BOWMAN

v.

CITY OF SOUTHFIELD.

Calendar No. 48. Docket No. 50,695.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

Decided March 8, 1966.

Davis, Hayward, Rann & Slavens, for plaintiff.

James M. Ginn, for defendants.

SMITH, J. (for reversal).

Plaintiff sought and obtained judgment against defendant city and its officials declaring a zoning ordinance void and unenforceable, insofar as applied to plaintiff's property. Defendants appeal.

In 1959, the city adopted an ordinance which zoned plaintiff's property residential. Although the property is located in a residential area, plaintiff has used…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Brae Burn, Inc. v. City of Bloomfield HillsMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Christine Building Co. v. City of TroyMichigan Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Austin v. OlderMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  5. City of North Muskegon v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1929

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API