Legal Opinion

Dodd v. Horan

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided July 5, 1930No. 2588PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDrew, J.

Plaintiff, who was employed as a bookkeeper by defendant, brought this suit claiming $350, balance due him as an employee of defendant, and provisionally seized a lot of staves, claiming a privilege on them for his salary. Beeson-Moore Stave Company intervened in the suit, claiming ownership , of the staves by purchase from defendant. The case was tried in the lower court, resulting in a judgment for plaintiff for the amount sued for and recognizing his privilege on said staves that were manufactured by defendant, and rejecting the demands of the intervener.

On appeal to this court the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dodd v. HoranLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1929
  2. Dodd v. HoranSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1929

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mengel Co. v. RazianoLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1952
  2. Garma v. GalmicheLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API