Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ciba-Geigy Corp. v. Liberty Mutual Insurance

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided May 12, 1997Published

1DissentO’Hern, J.

I disagree that the policyholders surrendered their right to a jury trial when they initiated their declaratory judgment actions. The decision represents an abrupt departure from longstanding New Jersey law.

“[Ujnder any declaratory judgment act, legal questions of fact must be tried before a jury where a demand for jury trial has been properly made.” 20 Appleman, Insurance Law and Practice § 11378(1980).

The reasoning that underlies this principle is quite simple. A declaratory judgment act merely provides a procedural device to accelerate the resolution of a dispute; the procedural device…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Beacon Theatres, Inc. v. WestoverSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  3. Ross v. BernhardSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. AIU Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Ayers v. Township of JacksonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API