Romeo v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
GILBERT, Circuit Judge.
In a petition for rehearing the defendants cite authorities to the proposition that, where objection is made to the competency of a witness to testify, the party offering the witness is not required to state what he expeets to prove by the witness. We find that the weight both of authority and reason is to the contrary (3 C. J. 829; Kischman v. Scott, 166 Mo. 214, 65 S. W. 1031; Hutchings v. Cobble, 30 Okl. 158, 120 P. 1013; Evans v. Smith, 50 Okl. 285, 150 P. 1096; Corcoran v. Poncini, 35 Ill. App. 130), and that in the federal courts the question is conclusively…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Herencia v. GuzmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Hutchings v. CobbleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Kischman v. ScottSupreme Court of Missouri · 1901
- Evans v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Corcoran v. PonciniAppellate Court of Illinois · 1889
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hass v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1929