Legal Opinion

In re Kalpachnikoff

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 26, 1928No. 93270PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DICKINSON, District Judge.

The conclusion reached is that the applicant should be admitted to citizenship. There is but one question to be answered in this ease. We say this because the Bureau of Naturalization would recommend him as worthy of citizenship, were it not for the sole objection next mentioned. The Naturalization Act prescribes as a condition of citizenship that two citizens shall certify “that they have personally known the applicant to be [have been] a resident of the United States for a period of • at least five years continuously,” etc. It is made a further "condition that “it…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Johannessen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. United States v. GinsbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  3. United States v. CantiniCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1914
  4. United States v. RockteschellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1913
  5. In re SchneiderU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1908

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Messick v. Southern Pennsylvania Bus Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1945
  2. Trigg v. TriggMissouri Court of Appeals · 1931
  3. Clark v. SettleDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API