Legal Opinion

Haberstick v. Gordon A. Gundaker Real Estate Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 16, 1996No. 67735, 67829PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOWD, Judge.

Gordon A. Gundaker Real Estate Company, Inc. (hereinafter “Gundaker”) appeals the judgments for fraudulent misrepresentation in favor of seven of eight husband and wife plaintiffs (hereinafter “Buyers”) who purchased property through Gundaker agents. Buyers cross-appeal the judgments entered on the directed verdicts granted in favor of Gundaker on their claims for fraudulent concealment. Married Buyers David E. Bart-nicki and Anita Otal further cross-appeal the court’s entry of judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV) on their fraudulent misrepresentation claim. We affirm in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Burnett v. GriffithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1989
  2. Dierker Associates, D.C., P.C. v. GillisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Carpenter v. Chrysler Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Bedell v. DaughertySupreme Court of Missouri · 1951
  5. Grosser v. Kandel-Iken Builders, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Renaissance Leasing, LLC v. Vermeer Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2010
  2. John Doe 1 v. Archdiocese of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Reis v. Peabody Coal Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. Chesus v. WattsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. Cotner Productions, Inc. v. SnadonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API