Seleman v. Seeeman

The chancellor granted the appellee a limited divorce on the ground of desertion, permanent alimony and custody of, and support for, an infant child of the parties. At the same time, he dismissed appellant’s cross-bill, which prayed for a limited divorce on the ground of desertion, and custody of the child.

The appellant claims that the chancellor committed error in seventeen rulings on evidence and seven other alleged assignments of error. However, the case may be determined by answering the following questions: (1) Was the chancellor clearly *4in error in finding that the appellant deserted…