Roger R. Lamkin v. State

Roger Lamkin appeals the summary denial of his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion for postconviction relief. After carefully considering all five claims asserted by Appellant, we affirm as to all except for claim two, which is not conclusively refuted by the records attached to the postconviction court’s order.

Appellant asserts in claim two that defense counsel provided ineffective assistance with regard to Appellant’s admitted violation of probation. Appellant alleged that his attorney advised him that the court had agreed to reinstate his probation with an additional condition…