Legal Opinion

C. I. T. Corp. v. Schubert

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided June 25, 1930PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLewis, J.

The plaintiff seeks the foreclosure of two hens arising out of the conditional sale of two buses by the Pierce Arrow Sales Corporation, the plaintiff’s assignor, to the defendant Daniel Schubert.

Daniel Schubert, the conditional vendee, has defaulted, and this controversy resolves itself into a dispute between this plaintiff and the defendant Morelite Service Stations, Inc., a garage keeper, asserting its liens for the storage of the automobiles and for gasoline, oil, grease and materials supplied for the same.

The defendant Morelite Service Stations, Inc., must look to the statute for its…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Johanns v. . FickeNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
  2. Dininny v. ReavisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
  3. Smith v. Pierce-Arrow Sales Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Potolski International, Inc. v. Hall's Boat Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
  2. Pacific States Finance Corp. v. FreitasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  3. Wyche v. New Amsterdam Garage Corp.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1975
  4. ITT Commercial Finance Corp. v. Kallmeyer & Sons Truck Tire Service Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API