Legal Opinion

Page-River-Curran v. Renegotiation Board

United States Tax Court

Decided March 31, 1971No. Docket No. 1049-RPublished

Renegotiation. -- Petitioner's motion that this Court rule that the burden of proof that petitioner realized excessive profits and the amount thereof is on respondent, denied.

1Opinion of the Court

Page-River-Curran, Petitioner v. Renegotiation Board, Respondent

Page-River-Curran v. Renegotiation Board

Docket No. 1049-R

United States Tax Court

55 T.C. 1153; 1971 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 160;

March 31, 1971, Filed

Renegotiation. -- Petitioner's motion that this Court rule that the burden of proof that petitioner realized excessive profits and the amount thereof is on respondent, denied.

Robert L. Ackerly and James J. Gallagher, for the petitioner.

Robert P. Donlan, for the respondent.

Drennen, Judge.

DRENNEN

OPINION

Petitioner filed a petition in this Court praying that the determination by the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Secretary of WarUnited States Tax Court · 1946
  2. Grumman Aircraft Engineering Corp. v. Renegotiation BoardUnited States Tax Court · 1969
  3. Page-River-Curran v. Renegotiation BoardUnited States Tax Court · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API