Legal Opinion

Asgrow Seed Co. v. Winterboer

District Court, N.D. Iowa

Decided November 14, 1991No. Civ. C91-4013PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DONALD E. O’BRIEN, Chief Judge.

This matter comes before the court pursuant to both parties’ motions for summary judgment. After careful consideration of the oral and written arguments this court sustains the plaintiff’s motion and denies the defendants’ motion.

FACTS

This is an action under the Plant Varieties Protection Act (“PVPA” or the “Act”). See, 7 U.S.C. §§ 2321-2582. In order to avail oneself of the protection of the Act, the developer of a novel plant variety 1 must apply to the Plant Variety Protection office for a Certificate of Plant Variety Protection. 7 U.S.C. § 2482. A…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Takao Ozawa v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Delta and Pine Land Company v. Peoples Gin Company and Hollandale Seed & Delinting Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Asgrow Seed Co. v. WinterboerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Asgrow Seed Company v. Denny Winterboer and Becky Winterboer, D/B/A Deebee'sCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
  3. Asgrow Seed Co. v. WinterboerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Asgrow Seed Company v. Denny Winterboer and Becky Winterboer, D/B/A Deebee'sCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API