Legal Opinion
Daigle v. Sherwin-Williams Co.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided December 29, 1988No. 88-CA-1367PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KLEES, Judge.
In this workmen’s compensation case, plaintiff, Michael Daigle, seeks supplemental earnings benefits under LSA-R.S. 23:1221(3)(a). The trial court rendered judgment denying these additional benefits. Plaintiff now appeals. We affirm.
Michael Daigle was employed as the manager of the Sherwin-Williams Paint Store on St. Charles Avenue in New Orleans when he injured his neck and back on May 12, 1984 while moving a case of paint. Prior to his employment at the St. Charles Avenue store, the plaintiff managed the Sherwin-Williams store in Hammond and also worked as a manager and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Allor v. Belden Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1981
- Valley v. American Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1987
- Clark v. WelexLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1987
- McElhaney v. Belden Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1979
- Smith v. State, Dept. of HighwaysLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1979
3Cited by2 opinions
- Daigle v. Sherwin-Williams Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
- Daigle v. Sherwin-Williams Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1989