Legal Opinion

People v. Padilla

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 17, 2014PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol A. Berkman, J.), entered on or about June 23, 2011 which adjudicated de*567fendant a level two sex offender under the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Clear and convincing evidence supported the court’s assessment of 15 points for defendant’s history of substance abuse, since defendant admitted to regular use of ecstasy, marijuana and alcohol. We reject defendant’s argument that the use of these illegal substances is akin to occasional social drinking (see People v Palmer, 20 NY3d 373 [2013]).…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. JohnsonNew York Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. People v. KnoxNew York Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. People v. PalmerNew York Court of Appeals · 2013

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. UphaelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  2. People v. AldarondoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  3. People v. JamisonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  4. People v. ParksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023
  5. People v. ParksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API