Legal Opinion

Hauserman v. Stadler

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided November 8, 1996No. S-94-1149PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConnolly, J.

The appellant, Connie Stadler, built a fence around her yard in Minden, Nebraska. Stadler’s neighbors successfully sought a declaratory judgment in which the district court determined that a fence is a “structure” as defined by the Minden city code and that Stadler was therefore required to obtain a zoning certificate authorizing the construction. Stadler appeals, contending that a declaratory judgment is an inappropriate remedy and that a zon ing certificate is not. required for constructing a fence. We conclude that a declaratory judgment was not appropriate in this case because a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Barelmann v. FoxNebraska Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Baker's Supermarkets, Inc. v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Ryder Truck Rental, Inc. v. RollinsNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Southern Nebraska Rural Public Power District v. Nebraska Electric Generation & Transmission Cooperative, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Zarybnicky v. County of GageNebraska Supreme Court · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Boettcher v. BalkaNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Pig Pro Nonstock Cooperative v. MooreNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Galyen v. BalkaNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Burke v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Neb.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Medical Protective Co. v. SchreinNebraska Supreme Court · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API