Legal Opinion

United States v. General Electric Co.

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided October 20, 1994No. Civ. No. 93-1526-FRPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FRYE, District Judge:

The matters before the court are: (1) the motion of the defendants, General Electric *162Company (GE), General Electric Government Engineering & Management Services, and Federal Insurance Company, to dismiss the plaintiffs complaint for failure to comply with this court’s discovery order entered on May 31, 1994 (# 41); and (2) the motion of the plaintiff, the United States of America for the use and benefit of P.W. Berry Company, Inc. (Berry), for a protective order (# 48).

CONTENTIONS OF THE PARTIES

The defendants contend that, under Rule 37(b)(2) of the Federal Rules…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Del P. Henry, Jr., a Single Man, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Gill Industries, Inc., Defendant-Appellee-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  2. Wanderer v. JohnstonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  3. Michael T. Porter v. Deputy Martinez, Deputy Rivera, Deputy Ruben, Deputy Morales, Deputy SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sierrapine v. Refiner Products Manufacturing, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2011
  2. Grosek v. Panther Transportation, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
  3. Kelly v. Kroger Limited Partnership IDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API