Legal Opinion

City of Chamberlain v. Putnam

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1897Published

Appeal from circuit court, Brule county. Hon. F. B. Smith, Judge. Paul H. Putnam was convicted before a police justice of assault and battery.. He appealed to the circuit court, and from an affirmance of the judgment of conviction he further appeals. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtHaney, J.

Defendant, having been convicted before a police justice for an alleged violation of the ordinances of the city of Chamberlain, appealed to the circuit court on questions of law alone, where the justice’s judgment was affirmed, and he appealed to this court.

It is alleged in the abstract that ‘ ‘the defendant, by his attorney, P. P. Haskell, prepared, served, and the justice before whom the case was heard allowed, the following statement on appeal, on the 5th day of October, 1895.” Respondent’s additional abstract contains the following: “No notice of the filing of any statement was ever given…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Tschetter v. HeiserSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API