Minnis v. Oregon Mutual Insurance
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*193DE MUNIZ, J.
In this insurance case, we are asked to determine whether Oregon Mutual Insurance Company (defendant) had a duty to defend its insured, Little John’s Pizza (Little John’s), in a tort action by a former Little John’s employee, Winters. After that action was settled, Little John’s and its owner, John Minnis (Minnis), brought this action against defendant. The trial court entered summary judgment in favor of defendant. The Court of Appeals reversed that judgment in part, holding that defendant had a duty to defend Little John’s because Winters’s complaint could have imposed vicarious…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hoffman Construction Co. of Alaska v. Fred S. James & Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1992
- Chesterman v. BarmonOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- Ferguson v. Birmingham Fire Insurance CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1969
- Stanfield v. LaccoarceOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Fearing v. BucherOregon Supreme Court · 1999
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Doe v. SeeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Vaughn v. First Transit, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2009
- Eads v. BormanOregon Supreme Court · 2012
- Jensen v. MedleyOregon Supreme Court · 2003
- ZRZ Realty Co. v. Beneficial Fire & Casualty InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.