Legal Opinion

State v. Elmore

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1875PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Delta. Tried below before the Hon. W. H. Andrews.

1Opinion of the Court

Ireland, Associate Justice.

The objections urged to the indictment in this case are not tenable. No good reason is shown why the indictment is not good. The party said to have been assaulted is described as “ one-, a freedman, whose name is to the grand jurors unknown.”

We think it sufficiently appears that the assault was made upon a person, and if his name was not known to the grand jury it was competent to describe the party as is done in this case.

It may he said that the name is necessary to enable the defendant to plead the judgment in bar to another prosecution. To this it may he answered…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Phillips v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1867
  2. Cochran v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1863

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Yantis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912
  2. Jorasco v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1879
  3. Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1877

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API