Legal Opinion

Shields v. Moody

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1899Published

Error to Mecosta; Edwards, J. Replevin by Fannie Shields and Benjamin T. James against Bert D. Moody, sheriff of Mecosta county. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiffs bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

This is an action of replevin to recover one brown stallion, one single harness, one road bike sulky, one cutting-box, two canvas tents, one adz, one spike-maul, one sledge-hammer, and one corn-cutter, all of which had been duly levied upon by the defendant, as sheriff, under a valid writ directed against the property of James Shields, the husband of the plaintiff Fannie Shields. The jury rendered a verdict for the defendant, upon which judgment was entered for a return of the property. The plaintiffs moved for a new trial, which was refused, and have brought the case to this court for review…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Alderman v. ManchesterMichigan Supreme Court · 1882

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API