Legal Opinion

Epstein v. Dimeo

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided May 30, 1997No. 95-686-APPEALPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

This matter came before the Supreme Court on April 15,1997, pursuant to an order directing the plaintiffs to appear and show cause why the issues raised in this appeal should not be summarily decided. The plaintiffs, Nathan B. Epstein, M.D., George Patton, Jr., Mary E. Patton, and Joseph S. Sinclair, appeal from a judgment entered in Superior Court in favor of the defendants, Thomas P. Dimeo and William P. Considine. After reviewing the memoranda submitted by the parties and after hearing their counsel in oral argument, we are of the opinion that cause has not been shown and that the…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Picard v. Barry Pontiac-Buick, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1995
  2. Jewel Company of America, Inc. v. GeorgeSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1977

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. Marra v. H & H Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1998
  2. Ouellette v. FilipponeSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API