Legal Opinion

Estill v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided October 27, 1897No. 1594PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Ho statement required.

1Opinion of the Court

DAYIDSOH, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of perjury, and appeals.

The assignments of perjury are predicated upon the testimony of appellant in a case in the County Court of Bee County wherein he was charged with the theft of a silver dollar. On the trial of that case he testified that he did not take said dollar, and that he was not at the house of Amanda Palmer on the day the dollar was taken. The dollar, if taken by appellant, was taken from said house. These statements of appellant were assigned as perjury. Among other things transpiring on the trial, the State introduced in evidence the…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. AlbersMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Bekkeland v. LyonsTexas Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Caple v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1909
  4. Bennett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1901
  5. Jordan v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1917

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API