People v. Eduardo M.
California Court of Appeal
[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ROTHSCHILD, J.
In the published portion of this opinion, we hold that when a criminal defendant or delinquent ward is convicted of aiding and abetting two felony firearm assaults, he cannot also be convicted of being an accessory to those felonies solely on the basis of his immediate flight from the scene and later denials of his own involvement, even if that conduct incidentally helped the shooter escape.
The juvenile court declared Eduardo M. a delinquent ward after the court found that he committed two assaults with a semiautomatic firearm by aiding and abetting the actual…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- People v. HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- State v. HawkinsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
- Staten v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
- People v. WallinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- People v. Malcolm M.California Court of Appeal · 2007
- United States v. VidalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- In re Jason V.California Court of Appeal · 2022
- In re Jason V.California Court of Appeal · 2022
- In re R.C.California Court of Appeal · 2019
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.