Legal Opinion

In re the Arbitration between Philadelphia Insurance & Utica National Insurance Group

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 6, 2012Published

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum: Petitioner commenced this proceeding pursuant to CPLR 7511 (b) seeking vacatur of the arbitration award on the ground that arbitration was not available because under Insurance Law § 5105 (a) neither of the vehicles involved in the collision was “used principally for the transportation of persons or property for hire.” We conclude that Supreme Court erred in granting the petition to vacate the arbitration award and in denying the cross motion to confirm the award. Inasmuch as petitioner failed to apply for a stay of arbitration before arbitration, petitioner waived its contention…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. People v. BingNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Rokowsky v. Finance AdministratorNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. Dufel v. GreenNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. People v. DamianoNew York Court of Appeals · 1996

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API