Legal Opinion

CENTRAL CONSTRUCTION COMPANY v. Blanchard

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1966No. 36033PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrower, J.

This is an action to foreclose a mechanic’s hen based on a written contract involving a time price differential. The trial court entered a judgment for the plaintiff for the amount of the cash contract price. The defendant has appealed, and the plaintiff has cross-appealed.

On April 10, 1963, the plaintiff and defendant entered into a written contract providing that the plaintiff would remodel and repair the defendant’s residence. The contract had a total cash price of $1,350, and contained a time price differential of $505.80, with a total time price balance of $1,855.80, payable in 60…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Elder v. DoerrNebraska Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Montgomery v. DresherNebraska Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Mazanec v. Lincoln Bonding and Insurance CompanyNebraska Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Interstate Savings & Loan Ass'n v. StrineNebraska Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Montgomery v. Albion National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1897

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Lockwood Corp. v. BlackDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1980
  2. Thomas Lakes Owners Ass'n v. RileyNebraska Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. Baker v. A. C. Nelson Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Midwest Floor Co. v. Miceli Development Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. Musser v. ZurcherNebraska Supreme Court · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API