Gallatin v. Oriental Bank
New York Supreme Court
Motion by defendants to dissolve injunction.
1Opinion of the Court
Ingraham, Justice.
The plaintiff’s claim in this case is for about $3,400. The property held by the bank, and which the plaintiff has enjoined, exceeds in value $30,000, for which it was transferred as security. The original indebtedness for which it was so transferred is not denied or in any way impeached by the plaintiff in his complaint, but by the injunction all the property is included, and the Oriental Bank is forbidden from receiving or collecting any part of it, or in any manner receiving the notes, &c., as they become due.
Such an injunction appears to me to create a greater wrong than…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Sammons v. City of GloversvilleNew York Supreme Court · 1901
- McSorley v. GomprechtThe Superior Court of New York City · 1892
- Sebald v. MulhollandThe Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo · 1893
- Heath v. President of Gold ExchangeNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1869