Legal Opinion

Bakeman v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided May 13, 2020No. 18-1861Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 18-1861V UNPUBLISHED CHARLES BAKEMAN, Chief Special Master Corcoran Petitioner, Filed: April 13, 2020 v. Special Processing Unit (SPU); SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND Attorney’s fees denied, Reasonable HUMAN SERVICES, Basis; H1N1 Vaccine; Guillain-Barre’ Syndrome (GBS) Respondent. Stephen I. Leshner, Phoenix, AZ, for Petitioner. Heather Lynn Pearlman, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent. DECISION DENYING ATTORNEY’S FEES AND COSTS1 On December 4, 2018, Charles Bakeman filed a petition for compensation…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cloer v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
  2. Joseph Osler Brice and Laurajean Councill Brice, on Behalf of Their Son, Joseph Tilghman Brice v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
  3. Scanlon v. Secretary of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API