Legal Opinion

Arkansas-Missouri Power Co. v. Brown

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 26, 1928PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kirby, J.,

(after stating the facts). It has long been settled law that, where a municipal corporation by ordinance grants ia franchise to a public service corporation to furnish electricity or gas to its inhabitants upon certain rates, terms and conditions, which are accepted in writing by the public service company, a contract between the parties is constituted, by which their rights ¡are to be determined, the terms and conditions becoming binding on the municipality and the company. Pocahontas v. Central Power & Light Co., 152 Ark. 276, 244 S. W. 712; Arkansas Light & Power Co. v. Cooley,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Arkansas Light & Power Co. v. CooleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1919
  2. Pocahontas v. Central Power and Light Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1922
  3. Lonoke v. BransfordSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1919

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cedar Island Improvement Assn. v. Clinton Electric Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
  2. Robinson v. Arkansas State Game & Fish CommissionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
  3. North Little Rock Water Co. v. Water Works CommissionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1940
  4. Howard v. WilburCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1948
  5. El Pueblo de Puerto Rico v. Franceschi de FlemingSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1951

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API