Legal Opinion

State v. Watson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 6, 1984No. 394A83PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Justice.

We begin with a procedural note which we suggest is worthy of consideration by trial counsel in appropriate cases: Prior to the trial of this case, counsel for this defendant submitted the following motion to Judge Snepp:

Now comes Defendant, by and through his counsel, Fritz Y. Mercer, Jr., and Isabel S. Day, and moves the Court to schedule a hearing prior to the trial of this case with regard to whether there is sufficient evidence to support the submission to the jury of the Aggravating Circumstance NCGS 15A-2000(e)(8).

The Defendant shows unto the Court the following:

1.…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  4. San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Sheppard v. MaxwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1966

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. State v. HennisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  2. State v. McCollumSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
  3. State v. GainesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1997
  4. State v. HoldenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  5. Rhyne v. K-Mart Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2004

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API