Legal Opinion

Russell v. The Minnesota Outfit

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 15, 1854PublishedCited by 1 opinion

The facts and the points made are stated, in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Oourt.

Sherburne, J.

This is an action in the nature of mdebitatus assumpsit, to recover a sum of money alleged to be due from tbe Defendants on account of freighting done by the Steamboat Gov. Ramsey. The Plaintiff alleges an assignment of the demand to him from the proprietors of the Boat, by one Parker, agent for and part owner of said Steamboat, “ for a valuable consideration.”

'The action was submitted to a Referee by the District Court, who reported in substance, among other things not material to the questions at issue here — that he had heard the parties and found 4hat the…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bidwell v. ColemanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1865

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API