Legal Opinion

State v. Hennenfent

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided September 23, 1992No. 91-1578PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAVORATO, Justice.

In this single issue appeal, we must decide whether certain banks that made good on forged checks of their depositors are insurers and therefore not entitled to restitution under Iowa’s victim restitution law. See Iowa Code §§ 910.1(1), 910.1(4) (1991). The district court concluded that the banks are victims, not insurers, and are therefore entitled to restitution. We agree and affirm.

From January 1989 through April 1990, Pamela J. Hennenfent worked as a legal secretary. ■ In that capacity Hennenfent had certain bookkeeping responsibilities not only for the law office…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hope Evangelical Lutheran Church v. Iowa Department of Revenue & FinanceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1990
  2. State v. StanleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State of Iowa v. Marc A. HagenSupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
  2. People v. Saint-AmansCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  3. Post-Newsweek Cable, Inc. v. Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Iowa · 1993
  4. State v. BushSupreme Court of Iowa · 1994
  5. Kinkaid v. John Morrell & Co.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2004

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API