Legal Opinion
Henderson v. Astrue
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided August 16, 2012No. Civil Action No. 11-955PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
WILLIAM L. STANDISH, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff, Leah K. Henderson, seeks judicial review of a decision of Defendant, Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security (“the Commissioner”), denying her application for supplemental security income (“SSI”) under Title XVI of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1381— 1383Í.1 Presently before the Court are the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56. For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment will be granted to the extent she seeks a remand of this case…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Bowen v. YuckertSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Debra Rogers v. Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Sullivan v. ZebleySupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Joseph A. Zurawski v. William A. Halter, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, .Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Gonzales v. ColvinDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
- Debby D. v. Frank Bisignano, Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2026
- Engle v. SaulDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
- KUNKEL v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITYDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2025
- MARTINIQUE v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITYDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2022
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.