Hortman v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Mikell, Judge.
Following a bench trial, Bradley Hortman was convicted of making terroristic threats (Count 1) and harassing phone calls (Count 2). Following the denial of his amended motion for new trial, Hortman appeals, contending he received ineffective assistance of counsel. Having reviewed the record, we affirm.
“On appeal from a criminal conviction after a bench trial, we view the evidence with all inferences in favor of the factfinder’s conclusion, giving due regard to the trial court’s opportunity to judge witness credibility.” So viewed, the evidence shows that on May 10, 2006, Janet…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Sanders v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
- Grooms v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
- Thornton v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2005
- Stanford v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
- Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- White v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2013
- Brown v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
- Lavertu v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
- Jacqueline G. Lavertu v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
- King v. the StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2016