Legal Opinion
Tyrrell v. City of Scranton
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 2, 2001No. 3:CV-00-0738PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
CAPUTO, District Judge.
Plaintiff Paul Tyrrell brought the present age discrimination action on April 21, 2000 alleging that he was unlawfully removed from his position as a firefighter for the city of Scranton, Pennsylvania. (Amended Complaint, Doc. 23.) The seven defendants fall into three classes for purposes of this court’s analysis: 1) the city of Scranton and its officers (“the city”); 2) the firefighters’ union (“the union”); and 3) the Harrisburg Area Community College and its officer (“HACC”). In separate motions, HACC and the union have moved for the dismissal of some or…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Robinson v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Touche Ross & Co. v. RedingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. ThurstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Slater v. Susquehanna CountyDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
- Thomas v. County of CamdenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2006
- Holmes v. Air Line Pilots Ass'n, InternationalDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2010
- Zurchin v. Ambridge Area Sch. Dist.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
- Boone v. Pennsylvania Office of Vocational RehabilitationDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2005
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.