Legal Opinion

People Ex Rel. New York Edison Company v. . Prendergast

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 18, 1919PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered December 14, 1918, which reversed an order of Special Term granting a' motion for a peremptory writ of mandamus to compel defendant to consider, under section 246 of the charter of the city of New York, the relator’s claim for a refund of a portion of taxes assessed against certain real property owned by relator and paid for the years 1905 to 1914 inclusive, in which…

Read the full summary

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered December 14, 1918, which reversed an order of Special Term granting a' motion for a peremptory writ of mandamus to compel defendant to consider, under section 246 of the charter of the city of New York, the relator’s claim for a refund of a portion of taxes assessed against certain real property owned by relator and paid for the years 1905 to 1914 inclusive, in which assessments, it was claimed, there was erroneously included the value of machinery owned not by the relator but by its…

1Opinion of the Court

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Chase, Collin, Cuddeback, Hogan, McLaughlin and Crane, JJ.

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. 1555 Boston Road Corp. v. Finance AdministratorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  2. City of Rochester v. ChiarellaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  3. Kilroe v. CraigAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
  4. St. Luke's Hospital v. BeameNew York Supreme Court · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API