Legal Opinion

Jay Liebman v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided February 23, 2012No. 11-10478UnpublishedCited by 6 opinions

Non-Argument Calendar.

1Per curiam

Pro se plaintiff-appellants Jay and Andrea Liebman (the Liebmans) appeal the dismissal of their complaint against Deutsche Bank, Ocwen Loan Servicing, and a number of named individuals (collectively Deutsche Bank). The Liebmans raise three arguments on appeal: (1) the district court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction over this case; (2) the district court erred by dismissing their complaint; and (3) the district court abused its discretion by denying their motion for recusal and reconsideration. After a thorough review of the record, we affirm.

In July 2010, the Liebmans filed a civil…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. David Richard Moon v. Lanson Newsome, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
  4. Alba v. MontfordCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
  5. Robert Garfield v. NDCHealth CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Mukamal v. General Electric Capital Corp. (In re Palm Beach Finance Partners, L.P.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 2013
  2. Mukamal v. BMO Harris Bank N.A. (In re Palm Beach Finance Partners, L.P.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 2013
  3. Bates v. LaminackDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2013
  4. Curtin v. St. Lucie County Sheriff PretrialDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2019
  5. Hudson v. Preston MorrisDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 2022

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API