Legal Opinion

Seligman v. Gray

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1887PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Saginaw. (Gage, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant Adams brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, C. J.

Seligman brought an action on the common counts under the statute upon a note of which Gray *342was maker, and Adams and Freeman were joint indorsers. No judgment was taken against Gray, and the suit stood on trial as a suit against the two indorsers. The defense was a failure to properly present the note for payment, and notify the indorsers of its dishonor. The court below directed the jury that the evidence showed a good demand and notice on Adams, but not on Freeman, and directed a verdict in favor of Freeman and against Adams. This charge was excepted to, and error assigned, among other…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Winslow v. HerrickMichigan Supreme Court · 1861

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. First National Bank & Trust Co. v. DolphMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Penfold v. SlyfieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Beekman v. SylvesterMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Williams v. ThomasDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API