Legal Opinion

James v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided February 4, 1925No. 8917Published

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

Attached to the motion for rehearing is a corrected transcript showing the election of the special judge who tried the case. Opposing the motion of the State to permit the correction of the record counsel for the appellant refers to Rule 2 prescribed by the Supreme Court in which- it is stated in substance that in application for certiorari the samé rules apply to the Court of Criminal Appeals as are applied to the Courts of Civil Appeals. This is recognized so far as it is applicable, but this court has uniformly pursued the practice of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Frazier v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
  2. Washington v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1919
  3. James v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1924
  4. Gould v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
  5. Lord v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API