Legal Opinion

Aguiar-Consolo v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 22, 2014PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

“ ‘An appellant who perfects an appeal by using the appendix method must file an appendix that contains all the relevant portions of the record in order to enable the court to render an informed decision on the merits of the appeal’ ” (Grossman v Composto-Longhi, 96 AD3d 1000, 1001 [2012], quoting Gandolfi v Gandolfi, 66 AD3d 834, 835 [2009]; see Christian v Graham, 73 AD3d 676, 677 [2010]). “The appendix shall contain those portions of the record necessary to permit the court to fully consider the issues which will be raised by the appellant and the respondent” (22 NYCRR 670.10-b [c] [1];…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Matison v. County of NassauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  2. Gerhardt v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  3. Gandolfi v. GandolfiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  4. Kruseck v. RossAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  5. Lowry v. Suffolk County Water AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Diana v. DeLisaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  2. Zhao v. Na ChanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API