Legal Opinion

State v. Williams

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided December 5, 1884PublishedCited by 20 opinions

On exceptions. The case was not argued at law court.

1Opinion of the CourtHaskell, J.

Indictment for adultery. The defendant testified in his own behalf.

The defendant excepted to the refusal of the presiding justice, to give the jury several requested instructions.

(1.) That the jury are to believe the story of the respondent, if they can reconcile it with the facts of the'case.

(2.) That the law presumes the honesty of the parties, and jurors are to seek to construe their testimony to be the truth.

Touching these questions the presiding justice did charge the jury; the facts " are all for you, exercising your good common sense, scanning the testimony carefully, taking the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Commonwealth v. O'ConnorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. O'DonnellOregon Supreme Court · 1900
  2. People v. . ThompsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
  3. People v. KollerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  4. State v. DeLongSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1986
  5. State v. WillsonOregon Supreme Court · 1925

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API