Legal Opinion

Nunn v. Mills

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 15, 1856PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Fayette. Tried before the Hon. E. W. Pettus.

1Opinion of the CourtWalker, J.

The appellee was the plaintiff, and the appellant the defendant, in an action for “ wrongfully taking a gray horse.” The defendant pleaded, in short by consent : "1st. Not guilty; 2d. That he levied on said horse by virtue of an attachment in favor of J. K. McCollum against said plaintiff, and that he was constable at the time.” The plaintiff replied to the 2d plea as follows : “ The plaintiff replies to the second plea, and says, that the above horse was a work horse, and the only one he had; and that he is a man of family, and claimed the same as exempt from execution under the statute in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cullum v. Branch of the Bank of AlabamaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1842
  2. Upson v. AustinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1842

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McAdory v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1877
  2. Trustees of Schools v. ArnoldAppellate Court of Illinois · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API