Legal Opinion

City of Atlanta v. Hofrichter/Stiakakis

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 13, 2008No. A08A0018PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mikell, Judge.

Eva Hofrichter/Stiakakis (“Hofrichter”) sued the City of Atlanta for nuisance arising from its failure to properly maintain a storm pipe that traversed and served her property, resulting in extensive flooding of the land and her home. Following a bench trial, the trial court awarded $510,376 in damages attributable to the nuisance and $325,148 in costs of litigation and attorney fees. Asserting several enumerations of error, the City appeals the judgment. We affirm.

1. The City contends that the evidence was insufficient as a matter of law to support the trial court’s judgment,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Hibbs v. City of RiverdaleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1996
  2. DeKalb County v. OrwigSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
  3. Merlino v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 2008
  4. City of Columbus v. BarngroverCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  5. Monterrey Mexican Restaurant of Wise, Inc. v. LeonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Toyo Tire North America Manufacturing, Inc. v. DavisSupreme Court of Georgia · 2016
  2. Hot Shot Kids Inc. v. Pervis (In re Pervis)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 2014
  3. Futch v. Lowndes CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
  4. Brock Built, LLC v. BlakeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
  5. INFINITE ENERGY, INC. v. CottrellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API