Legal Opinion

Donnelly v. Booth Bros.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided March 23, 1897PublishedCited by 13 opinions

On Motion and Exceptions by Defendants. This was an action in wbicli the plaintiff claimed to recover for injuries sustained through the negligence of the defendants. At the time of the injury the plaintiff was in the employment of the defendants and was assisting in loading a schooner with paving at the defendants’ wharf.

Read the full summary

On Motion and Exceptions by Defendants. This was an action in wbicli the plaintiff claimed to recover for injuries sustained through the negligence of the defendants. At the time of the injury the plaintiff was in the employment of the defendants and was assisting in loading a schooner with paving at the defendants’ wharf. In this work a platform or staging was used, one end resting upon the wharf and the other extended out over the hatchway of the vessel, this end being supported by the fore and main throat halyards of the vessel. While the last carload of paving rested upon this platform…

1Opinion of the CourtStrout, J.

Defendants operated a granite quarry at Long Cove. They were shipping granite paving blocks by a schooner lying at a wharf. The mode of loading the blocks on board was over a run or platform, sixteen to eighteen feet long, one end rest*113ing upon the wharf, and the other supported by rigging attached to the vessel’s throat halyards. This end extended to the forward hatch and was elevated about seven feet above the deck. The paving blocks were placed in a car and pushed over rails upon this run or platform, and dumped into the hold of the vessel. The plaintiff was in the employ of the defendants,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ford v. Fitchburg RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
  2. Arkerson v. DennisonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
  3. Kelley v. NorcrossMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
  4. McGinty v. Athol Reservoir Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Stearns & Culver Lumber Co. v. FowlerSupreme Court of Florida · 1909
  2. Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. Phillips' AdministratixSupreme Court of Virginia · 1902
  3. Engen v. Rambler Copper & Platium Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Haakensen v. Burgess Sulphite Fibre Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1912
  5. Nebraska Bridge Supply & Lumber Co. v. JefferyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API