Legal Opinion

Haehl v. Montgomery

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided August 9, 2011No. 22A01-1007-TR-319Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BROWN, Judge.

Brian Haehl appeals the trial court’s Order Approving Trustees Amended Final Accounting, Awarding Judgment for Attorney Fees and Costs in Favor of Trust Beneficiary and Successor Trustee and Denying Award of Additional Trustee Fees, Expenses, Costs and Attorney Fees to Former Trustee and His Attorney (the “2010 Order”) in favor of David Montgomery, as trust beneficiary, and Phyllis Crambo 1 as successor trustee (collectively, the “Appellees”). Haehl raises four issues, which we consolidate and restate as:

I. Whether the court abused its discretion when it removed Haehl as…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Matter of LawranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Zukerman v. MontgomeryIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. Malachowski v. Bank One, Indianapolis, N.A.Indiana Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Zaring v. ZaringIndiana Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Goins v. RiddleIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API