Legal Opinion
Mormile v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided March 1, 2000No. 3:97CV1509(WWE)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
EGINTON, Senior District Judge.
Plaintiff Robert Mormile, a thirty year employee of defendant Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (“Metlife”), brings this action alleging violations of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), breach of contract and promissory estoppel. Pending is the defendants’ motion for summary judgment [Doc. # 21] on all five counts of the plaintiffs complaint. 1 For the following reasons the defendants’ motion will be granted as to the plaintiffs ERISA claims in Counts Three, Four and Five. The Court need not…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Grishelda Bryant v. John J. Maffucci, Dawn Thackeray, Yvonne Powell, Norwood Jackson and Dr. Edward AllanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- John C. Donahue v. Windsor Locks Board of Fire Commissioners, John R. Colli, Jr., Russell C. Gabrielson, and John R. Colli, IIICourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Gloria Pagan v. Nynex Pension Plan and Nynex CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Dunn v. Standard InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2001
- Harris v. Mohegan Election Committee & MembersMohegan Tribal Court of Appeals · 2013