Legal Opinion

White v. Transunion, LLC

District Court, C.D. California

Decided October 19, 2006No. CV 05-1073 DOCMLGXPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*682 CIVIL MINUTES—GENERAL

CARTER, District Judge.

PROCEEDING (IN CHAMBERS): DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO APPOINT LIEFF, CABRASER HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN, LLP AND CADDELL & CHAPMAN AS INTERIM CLASS COUNSEL

Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion to Appoint Lieff, Cabraser Hermann & Bernstein, LLP (“Lieff Cabraser”) and Caddell & Chapman (“Caddell”) as Interim Class Counsel (“Motion”). The Court finds the matter appropriate for decision without oral argument. Fed.R.Civ.P. 78; Local R. 7-15. After reviewing the moving and opposing papers, for the reasons set forth below the Court DENIES Plaintiffs’ Motion

I…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Devlin v. ScardellettiSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. Turner v. Murphy Oil USA, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2006
  3. In re Delphi Erisa LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2005

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Dhruva v. CuriosityStream Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2024
  2. Dhruva v. CuriosityStream Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2024
  3. In re Accellion, Inc. Data Breach LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2023
  4. In re Amazon Prime Video LitigationDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2024
  5. In re Dexilant (Dexlansoprazole) Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2026

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API