Legal Opinion

Northern Pacific Terminal Co. v. Lowenberg

United States Circuit Court

Decided November 16, 1883PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Action to Appropriate Property.

1Opinion of the CourtDead's, J.

On April 17, 1883, the plaintiff commenced an action in the state circuit court for the county of Multnomah against the defendants, as the owners and possessors of a triangular-shaped piece of land, lying in the north-east corner of. block 28, in Watson’s addition to Portland, containing about 590 square feet, to appropriate the same to its use for railway purposes, under the provisions of the corporation act of Oregon. See Or. Laws, 533., The complainant alleges that the plaintiff is a corporation formed and existing under the laws of Oregon, for the purpose, among other things, of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Boom Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Hyde v. RubleSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  3. King v. CornellSupreme Court of the United States · 1882

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Amalgamated Workers Union of the Virgin Islands v. Hess Oil Virgin Islands CorpCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
  2. Chase v. ErhardtDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 1912
  3. Goins v. Southern Pac. Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1912
  4. Lawrence v. Southern Pac. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern New York · 1910
  5. Bryant Bros. v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1906

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API