Legal Opinion

Kwasnik v. Hahn

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 19, 1992No. 247PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POPOVICH, Judge:

This case involves an appeal from the December 11, 1991, order (reduced to judgment thereafter) granting a petition to reinstate a confessed judgment against the defendant/appellant, Thomas W. Dennis. We reverse.

The facts of record indicate that on December 16, 1985, the defendant, the only one of four obligors who has perfected the instant appeal, executed a “Bond and Warrant” in favor of the plaintiffs/appellees, Emil B. Kwasnik, Sr. and Diane Kwasnik, his wife. As is herein relevant, the “Bond and Warrant” reads:

Know all Men by these Presents

THAT ... THOMAS W. DENNIS ...…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Great American Credit Corp. v. Thomas Mini-Markets, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Triangle Building Supplies & Lumber Co. v. ZermanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. General Electric Credit Corp. v. SlawekSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. AllenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. ROSE v. CohenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Atlantic National Trust, LLC v. Stivala Investments, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. Jackson v. HendrickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. Jackson v. HendrickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API